Desk note · Codex · Policy
Tibo’s Tuesday reply answers a request for a banked reset
The parent post asks for a banked reset; Tibo says OK fine and mentions Tuesday. The exchange supports a reset watch, with scope, timezone and delivery still unresolved.
@udiWertheimer OK fine. But it’s also still coming in Tuesday
“@udiWertheimer OK fine. But it’s also still coming in Tuesday”
On September 18, Udi Wertheimer asked Tibo for a banked reset. Tibo replied on September 19 with ‘OK fine’ and said it was also still coming Tuesday. The parent request supplies material context that the reply alone leaves out.
Correction, September 22: our initial coverage described the subject as unspecified without checking the parent request. X syndication now verifies both original posts and their direct reply relationship. We have added the parent capture and corrected the headline and explanation.
This supports a banked-reset watch. It does not establish that credits have arrived, who will receive them, or whether the later 3am timing hint refers to the same event. Any delivery claim will require its own primary evidence.
What it means
- This exchange is evidence of a forthcoming-reset discussion, not proof that a reset was delivered on September 19.
- Udi’s parent post asks for a banked reset. Tibo’s response supports that interpretation but does not state eligible plans, final terms or a timezone.
- The later 3am-on-Tuesday reply is a separate exchange. A connection is plausible, but neither post explicitly establishes it.